- Status New
- Percent Complete
- Task Type Bug Report
- Category Packages
- Assigned To No-one
- Operating System pentium4
- Severity Low
- Priority Medium
- Reported Version
- Due in Version Undecided
-
Due Date
Undecided
- Votes
- Private
Attached to Project: Arch Linux 32
Opened by Andreas Baumann - 05.05.2022
Last edited by Andreas Baumann - 06.05.2022
Opened by Andreas Baumann - 05.05.2022
Last edited by Andreas Baumann - 06.05.2022
Let's start to fix the lowest versions..
openjdk8:
I fail to see a message about libjsound.so not being built or so?
Let's see, what 64-bit builds look like..of course, this one builds fine.
So why should 32-bit "loose" the libjsound.so library?
Aha, CARCH and _JARCH are not up to snuff:
mmh. strange: in build-support I have a fully bootstrapped version for each and
every JDKs sind JDK8, the patches there never made their way into the main
packages. (or I was ahead in keeping older verision of JDK around as separate
versions for bootstrapping).
JDK8 builds fine.
JDK11 looks really ugly: Segfaults in ld when linking early in the build process..
.. just try a rebuild. Maybe we had a glitchy toolchain..
Java 11 still fails:
I especially like failing assertions in the linker:
There is the possibility that newer compilers make a mess here, this means that
in the future we might have to resort to older compilers and linkers to build java?